llvmorg-github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-libunwind Author: Heejin Ahn (aheejin) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> We switched to use `_UA_SEARCH_PHASE` in https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/pull/17991, but the comment above was not fixed, and it was upstreamed that way later. --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/206660.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) libunwind/src/Unwind-wasm.c (+1-1) ``````````diff diff --git a/libunwind/src/Unwind-wasm.c b/libunwind/src/Unwind-wasm.c index c0ca9b775d244..2e949d005b8f5 100644 --- a/libunwind/src/Unwind-wasm.c +++ b/libunwind/src/Unwind-wasm.c @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ _Unwind_Reason_Code _Unwind_CallPersonality(void *exception_ptr) { __wasm_lpad_context.selector = 0; // Call personality function. Wasm does not have two-phase unwinding, so we - // only do the cleanup phase. + // only do the search phase. return __gxx_personality_wasm0( 1, _UA_SEARCH_PHASE, exception_object->exception_class, exception_object, (struct _Unwind_Context *)&__wasm_lpad_context); `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/206660 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
