lenary wrote:

I am reasonably concerned about the syntax here. It's 
`__riscv_<mode>(<state>)`, but the current states are vendor-only. I recall 
that Xsfmm is a vendor version of one of the matrix specs, how do we expect 
this to be used if that is standardised? Would we just end up accepting a 
different name in the state portion?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/206260
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to