================
@@ -6499,6 +6499,8 @@ static ExprResult BuildConvertedConstantExpression(Sema
&S, Expr *From,
return ExprError();
if (From->containsErrors()) {
+ if (isa<RecoveryExpr>(From))
----------------
mizvekov wrote:
What if the existing RecoveryExpr has a type which is not T?
Wasn't that the point of the PR which introduced this check?
What about not introducing the RecoveryExpr in case the expression already has
type T?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/207072
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
