nickdesaulniers wrote: > Was there an RFC for this?
LFI is a (nascent) backend tech; technically a subtly-different ABI from something like aarch64-linux-gnu. https://llvm.org/docs/LFI.html TL;DR it rewrites loads/stores/syscalls to create a "faster sandbox." This PR adds controls to whether we skip sanitizing loads or stores individually. > does GCC support this under this spelling GCC does not support LFI at all (yet). > is an -m flag the right design I think so as most `-m` flags have implications on the ABI, but am open to suggestions. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/204689 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
