================
@@ -505,6 +505,52 @@ TEST(VerifierTest, AtomicRMWElementwiseFPOpOnIntVector) {
<< Error;
}
+TEST(VerifierTest, AtomicRMWIntVector) {
----------------
YonahGoldberg wrote:
I think the positive test is not useful because we have coverage from the
assembler lit test. But the negative test is still useful because all my
current negative tests will get rejected by the assembler and not make it to
the verifier. I think it's still useful to test that the verifier rejects
scalable vectors.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/190716
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
