petrhosek wrote: > > @petrhosek : could you perhaps share a good way to reproduce that > > consistently? Our CI/buildbots don't seem to have caught it. > > +1
Here are the reproducers from all the failing libc++ tests. [assign_range-d06603.tar.gz](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/29878514/assign_range-d06603.tar.gz) [assign_range-db8647.tar.gz](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/29878515/assign_range-db8647.tar.gz) [construct_from_range-c7143a.tar.gz](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/29878516/construct_from_range-c7143a.tar.gz) [insert_range-4dc971.tar.gz](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/29878517/insert_range-4dc971.tar.gz) [insert_range-69b649.tar.gz](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/29878518/insert_range-69b649.tar.gz) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/208285 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
