owenca wrote: > A non-trailing block comment on its own line (e.g. between declarations) > should break the trailing comment alignment sequence.
This is still the case after bae9ddca423145baf0c35e31898b723aa273f85c for a sequence within the same block. > This is a regression introduced by > [bae9ddc](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bae9ddca423145baf0c35e31898b723aa273f85c) > which correctly stopped marking standalone block comments as trailing, but > did not account for their role as alignment sequence barriers. See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/208266#issuecomment-4933319757. The sequence should end at a block regardless. We should fix the bug in `OverEmptyLines` instead. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/208324 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
