https://github.com/Xazax-hun requested changes to this pull request.

Could you elaborate on the problem? 

@NeKon69 suggested a transition path on the original PR, and the old syntax is 
still supported, one can just disable the deprecation warning in the worst case.

I am not sure how much more we can do to support the transition path. Maybe if 
that suggested approach does not work we could add a feature test macro? 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/208691
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to