================ @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -verify-directives -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx98-11,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,cxx98 -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -verify-directives -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx98-11,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 %s -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -verify-directives -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++17 %s -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -verify-directives -verify=expected,cxx98-23,since-cxx17,cxx98-17,since-cxx11 -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %s -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -verify-directives -verify=expected,cxx98-23,since-cxx20,since-cxx17,since-cxx11 -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 %s -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -verify-directives -verify=expected,cxx98-23,since-cxx23,since-cxx20,since-cxx17,since-cxx11 -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2c %s -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -verify-directives -verify=expected,since-cxx26,since-cxx23,since-cxx20,since-cxx17,since-cxx11 +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors -fno-spell-checking -verify-directives -verify=expected,cxx98-23,cxx98-11,cxx98-14,cxx98-17,cxx98 ---------------- AaronBallman wrote:
> I'd be very much in favor of disabling spell-checking on the frontend by > default (and keep it enabled by default on the driver, which is the user > visible bit). > And then isolating the spell-check flag only to spell-check tests. That seems reasonable to me assuming the community agrees, but at the same time, the feedback from @Endilll is valid and we should pull this change back as it's not correct for the status quo. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/208586 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
