rnk added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp:3269-3273
+ bool IsMain = false;
+ if (D.getIdentifier() && D.getIdentifier()->isStr("main") &&
+ S.CurContext->getRedeclContext()->isTranslationUnit() &&
+ !S.getLangOpts().Freestanding)
+ IsMain = true;
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
> rnk wrote:
> > I highly doubt this is correct. I have a feeling there are all kinds of
> > ways you can get this to fire on things that aren't a function declaration.
> > It's also inefficient to check the identifier string every time we make a
> > function type. Please find somewhere else to add this. I'd suggest
> > adjusting the function type in CheckMain, or some time before then,
> > whereever we make main implicitly extern "C".
> I believe the logic here was pulled from FunctionDecl's "isMain" function:
> https://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/classclang_1_1FunctionDecl.html#aa2b31caf653741632b16cce1ae2061cc
>
> As this is so early in the process (at Declarator), I didn't see a good place
> to recommend extracting this, besides pulling it into the Declarator.
>
> CheckMain is also run at the Decl stage, isn't it? Is your suggestion be to
> simply let this go through with the wrong calling-convention here, then
> revert it it in "CheckMain"?
Yep. You can look at how we use FunctionTypeUnwrapper and
ASTContext::adjustFunctionType in various places to fix up function types that
were built with the wrong calling convention without losing type source info.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39210
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
