arsenm wrote: > It seems like after this we might be able to make the second parameter to > `fillValidArchListAMDGCN`? Is there a valid use-case for the `NoArch` version?
The diagnostic for __builtin_amdgcn_processor_is makes use of it https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/206481 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
