================
@@ -1048,7 +1048,8 @@ def int_callbr_landingpad : Intrinsic<[llvm_any_ty],
[LLVMMatchType<0>],
def int_structured_gep
: DefaultAttrsIntrinsic<[llvm_anyptr_ty],
- [LLVMMatchType<0>, llvm_vararg_ty],
+ [LLVMMatchType<0>, llvm_anyvector_ty,
+ llvm_vararg_ty],
----------------
dtcxzyw wrote:
Having a glance at the original proposal
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-adding-instructions-to-to-carry-gep-type-traversal-information/88141,
it looks like we chose an intrinsic instead of a dedicated instruction because
we didn't care about the flags at that time?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/200093
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits