================
@@ -111,3 +119,34 @@ namespace cwg1070 { // cwg1070: 3.5
C c = {};
#endif
} // namespace cwg1070
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+namespace cwg1094 { // cwg1094: 24
+enum class E : bool { Zero, One };
----------------
Endilll wrote:
CWG1094 is not limited to enums with the underlying type of `bool`, so I want
to see a similar set of test cases, but with enum whose fixed underlying type
is `int`.
Furthermore, I'm not sure I agree with the description of CWG1094 saying that
the old [expr.static.cast]/7 ("The inverse of any standard conversion
sequence...") is handling enums without a fixed underlying type, as this
paragraph was removed recently in
[CWG2987](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2987.html) "Remove dilapidated
wording from `static_cast`".
Separately, since we're looking closely at this wording, I think we should mark
[CWG1739](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/1739.html) "Conversion of
floating point to enumeration" as N/A.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/211172
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
