jhuber6 wrote: > Isn't this what you get by not passing no -O flag? I'd rather take the > no-opts by default than explicitly using -O0
The linked PR has the background, there's a complaint that moving to LTO regressed the DWARF information https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/211790 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
