================ @@ -7,6 +7,24 @@ Both provide a way of driving the analyzer, detecting compilation flags, and gen CodeChecker is more actively maintained, provides heuristics for working with multiple versions of popular compilers and it also comes with a web-based GUI for viewing, filtering, categorizing and suppressing the results. Therefore CodeChecker is recommended in case you need any of the above features or just more customizability in general. +Machine-readable output +----------------------- + +For a direct analysis of a source file, the ``clang`` driver can write a SARIF report that is suitable for automation and AI agents:: ---------------- steakhal wrote:
```suggestion For a direct analysis of a source file, the ``clang`` driver can write a SARIF report:: ``` https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/209519 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
