philnik777 wrote: > > > > Is there even a platform-generic type for scalable vectors yet? > > > > > > > > > Sadly, no. > > > > > > That seems like the thing we should solve first. After that I wouldn't be > > surprised if we didn't need this builtin at all. > > No, it's the other way round. When I tried to introduce a platform-generic > vector type, one of the comments was we should first improve builtin coverage > of the sizeless vector types...
This is basically adding `VectorOfT(T)` though (assuming we end up designing a scalable vector type in a similar way to `ext_vector_type`). We don't need another builtin for that. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/212758 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
