================
@@ -865,6 +865,24 @@ ObjCMethodDecl
*ObjCMethodDecl::CreateDeserialized(ASTContext &C,
Selector(), QualType(), nullptr, nullptr);
}
+void ObjCMethodDecl::getNameForDiagnostic(raw_ostream &OS,
+ const PrintingPolicy &Policy,
+ bool Qualified) const {
+ if (Qualified) {
+ OS << (isInstanceMethod() ? '-' : '+');
+ OS << '[';
+ if (const auto *ID = getClassInterface())
+ OS << ID->getName();
+ else if (const auto *PD = dyn_cast<ObjCProtocolDecl>(getDeclContext()))
+ OS << PD->getName();
+ else
+ OS << "<Unknown>";
----------------
steakhal wrote:
I worry about code coverage and dead code. Are these defensive checks warranted?
I was looking at `ObjCPropertyDecl::getNameForDiagnostic` and it had quite some.
Can we cover them or think of plausible scenarios when they could occur?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/213030
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
