rnk accepted this revision. rnk added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D39365#909912, @compnerd wrote: > @rnk given that the remote unwinder is completely unimplemented ATM, I think > that this isn't a big concern. I'm not sure that this makes anything worse, > but I do feel that it is making things better (especially since > `RemoteAddressSpace` is currently mostly just a '// FIXME: implement'). Sounds good to me, just wanted to check. :) https://reviews.llvm.org/D39365 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
