OCHyams wrote: I feel like this could reasonably affect profiling? (haven't done any measurements)
Could the issue be less that the instruction has a line number associated and and more that it's possible to step on it. I.e., if we could convey to LLVM that it shouldn't be is_stmt, that would be better than removing the source association. We get that behaviour with Key Instructions (`-gkey-instructions`) but that feature is only enabled by default with optimisations (and is only available for DWARF). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/212942 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
