================
@@ -779,10 +779,10 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitLabelStmt(const LabelStmt &S) {
}
void CodeGenFunction::EmitAttributedStmt(const AttributedStmt &S) {
- bool nomerge = false;
- bool noinline = false;
- bool alwaysinline = false;
- bool noconvergent = false;
+ bool nomerge = InNoMergeAttributedStmt;
+ bool noinline = InNoInlineAttributedStmt;
+ bool alwaysinline = InAlwaysInlineAttributedStmt;
+ bool noconvergent = InNoConvergentAttributedStmt;
StringRef amdgpuAVMode;
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
Uh, why shouldn't musstail propagate inwards? Why should:
```
[[musttail]] {
some_call;
}
```
and
```
[[musttail]] {
[[always_inline]]
some_call;
}
```
Have DIFFERENT musttail behaviors? EXISTING behavior is that it will propagate
to the inner statement, unless we have an attributedstmt (possibly/likely
unrelated), so it shouldn't 'change' it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/215173
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits