erichkeane wrote: > > This PR doesn't appear to comply with our policy on tool-generated content, > > and requires additional justification for why it is valuable enough to the > > project for us to review it. Please see our developer policy on > > AI-generated contributions: http://llvm.org/docs/AIToolPolicy.html > > In particular, this does not show any evidence of the "human in the loop" > > (and is very clearly fully AI generated). And based on your other PR, it > > appears you need to spend less time with your AI and more time working > > through this on your own. > > @erichkeane Thank you for your review. I can understand your concern. I build > it, tested it locally, review it before publishing on github. I would > appreciate if you review it and keep the pr open, I will address all your > concern during the review process. I used AI here as an assisting tool. I > will be more careful about your concern from next time.
Please read the message. The 'human in the loop' is insufficient here. This is not a 'do better next time', this is a 'do better right now' warning. This is now in "requires additional justification for why it is valuable enough to the project for us to review it". https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/214653 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
