serge-sans-paille wrote:
> > I don't think we should and new annotations for clang just for sake of
> > clang-tidy. ...
>
> +1. FYI
> https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-a-class-attribute-clang-null-after-move-for-use-after-move-analysis/89760
That's super useful. Thanks :bow: I moved to
```
[[clang::annotate("clang-tidy", "bugprone-use-after-move",
"specified_after_move")]]
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/216121
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
