jhuber6 wrote: > If there is a correctness issue with it in LTO mode, could you share a > concrete reproducer? I think that should be handled in a separate PR.
Nothing concrete, I just figured that it was solving a problem LTO already solved. I think in the past it was because the ROCm Device Libs sometimes had protected vis too. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/211675 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
