zmodem wrote: > I've always kind of held out this idea that clang[++] are perfectly > reasonable frontends to use when targeting an MSVC-environment with an > official Microsoft Windows SDK
Me too, but isn't this PR a different idea? This is about using clang with MSVC/Win SDK turned into a Unix-style sysroot, which seems like a much narrower use case. I think it would be better if the driver could work with the MSVC/SDK as-is, rather than forcing the user to change the SDK into a form that the driver likes (even if it's a "standard" form in the sense that other sysroots use it). That would probably require more work, such as supporting case-insensitive includes, but seems like it would be much user friendlier. But I won't block this if there's otherwise strong support for it. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96417 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
