klimek added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D32478#806757, @Typz wrote:
> I renamed the option to `AlignAfterOperator`, is it acceptable now? > (I also thought of `UnindentOperator`, but I think it is better to keep the > notion of alignment) > > Note that this style is used in multiple open-source projects: Skia > <https://skia.org/>, parts of QtCreator > <https://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qtcreator-extending/coding-style.html> code base > (e.g. in multiple plugins: clang, cpptools, android...), the OpenEXR > <https://github.com/openexr/openexr> library... Sorry for the long response time. I don't see this style rule expressed explicitly in the Skia or QtCreator style guides - is this something that just happens to be done sometimes in the code bases? I have problems understanding the rules from the discussion (as well as the code / test tbh), is there a really concise way to give me the core of the idea? https://reviews.llvm.org/D32478 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
