Bojun-Seo wrote: > > > > I'm still working on it, but this month’s AI tokens have all been used > > > > up. I’ll update the revision work at the beginning of next month. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > God you people can't do anything. > > > > > > Your comment sounds a lot like the old-school criticism when compilers were > > first introduced: 'You people can’t do anything without a compiler.' > > Today, leveraging AI is simply standard practice for maximizing > > productivity. As an open-source contributor, I believe in absolute > > transparency about both my workflow and the reasons behind schedule > > adjustments. > > I hope we can keep our community interactions focused on technical, > > constructive conversations moving forward. > > It's not the AI usage itself, it's the fact that you said you couldn't do > anything because you ran out of tokens for the month so you wait until next > month, which is ironically against the productivity thing you just mentioned. > Also this is a compiler project after all. > > Also you didn't do the AI disclaimer disclosure either. > > Nevertheless, I hope you are doing well. > > I just think "wait until start of next month because I ran out of tokens" > gives off the impression you are writing this pass without any ability to > reason through what the pass is doing on your own. That's all. > > Apologies for the bluntness.
**First, regarding the AI disclaimer, I actually did include it.** It is present in both my commit message and the RFC post on Discourse, formatted as follows: Assisted-by: GPT-5.6 Sol Assisted-by: Grok If I missed a specific guidelines or formatted this incorrectly, please let me know how I should fix it. **Second, I never stated that I cannot do anything without AI or that I rely solely on it.** The reason you might have that impression is likely because you haven't reviewed the breakdown of my workflow that I shared above. If you look at it, you will see that I thoroughly review and reason through every single line of code at the final stage. **Third, productivity is not just about raw speed; it also encompasses throughput.** Furthermore, productivity should be viewed from the perspective of an individual, not the community as a whole. I am not someone who works exclusively on the LLVM project or open-source software full-time. I contribute to LLVM in my spare time while managing other responsibilities. To make this possible, I strategically allocate my personal time and available AI resources. **Finally, being blunt or direct is never an issue. However, your comments cross the line into mockery, which I believe is problematic—especially your PS note.** I do not know how much influence you hold in this community, but I see very little value in responding to this tone moving forward. Therefore, I will not be replying to your comments from now on. Although we haven’t interacted for long, thank you for sharing your perspective. Assisted-by: ChatGPT https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/213846 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
