Meinersbur wrote: > `-fmodule-verify=[strict|strict-user|relaxed|none]`
I have no strong preference to the option name and I think there are probably a better names than what I chose. I was e.g. undecided between `on` and `always`, `user` and `non-intrinsic`, and `-fmodule-mismatch-check` and `-fignore-module-checksums` (its negation). My bikesheeding for `-fmodule-verify` would be that it sounds like it would verify the module individually, but is meant to check the concistency between modules. > and `none` does not even warn on mismatches. `Wno-module-verify` could be an > alias for `-fmodule-verify=none` `-Wno-module-verify` comes from the warning diagnostic handling system. Making it an alias to non-warning switches is not that easy. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/219181 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
