================
@@ -5752,6 +5752,13 @@ llvm::Constant *CodeGenModule::GetOrCreateLLVMFunction(
}
}
}
+ if (LangOpts.IncrementalExtensions && LangOpts.CUDAIsDevice) {
+ const auto *FD = cast<FunctionDecl>(D);
+ if (const FunctionDecl *Def = FD->getDefinition();
+ Def && Def->hasBody() &&
+ (Def->isInlined() || Def->getFormalLinkage() == Linkage::Internal))
----------------
yxsamliu wrote:
This uses source-level `inline` and formal linkage, while the existing
incremental logic uses the actual LLVM linkage: internal, linkonce, or weak.
These can differ for templates and weak functions. Could this reuse the
existing linkage rule and explain why the current `DeferredDecls` path does not
handle this case?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/218784
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
