================
@@ -559,9 +559,15 @@ static PathDiagnosticLocation getLocationForCaller(const
StackFrame *SF,
return PathDiagnosticLocation::createEnd(Dtor.getBindTemporaryExpr(), SM,
CallerSF);
}
+ case CFGElement::CleanupFunction: {
+ const CFGCleanupFunction &Cleanup = Source.castAs<CFGCleanupFunction>();
+ // The implicit call is not written in the source; anchor it at the
+ // function name in the cleanup attribute.
+ const CleanupAttr *A = Cleanup.getVarDecl()->getAttr<CleanupAttr>();
+ return PathDiagnosticLocation(A->getLoc(), SM);
----------------
necto wrote:
is it the function-name location or the attribute construct location?
Either way, a test that puts them on different lines would be helpful to know
which one it is
```
int x
__attribute__
((cleanup(noop_cleanup)));
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/221110
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
