Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2026-09-13T07:50:47+02:00
New Revision: 051c49202368a8478661548b5b8de03549d9d183

URL: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/051c49202368a8478661548b5b8de03549d9d183
DIFF: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/051c49202368a8478661548b5b8de03549d9d183.diff

LOG: [clang][test] Remove an uninitialized read in a test case (#223120)

This test case was added in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/222212. Its purpose is to
check that explicit constructor calls work at compile time.

However, the test case left var.a uninitialized and the copy constructor
reads an unitialized value. MSVC diagnoses this, but clang currently
fails to do so.

Change the test case to remove the unrelated problem of an uninitialized
read.

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    clang/test/SemaCXX/ms-ctor-closure.cpp

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/ms-ctor-closure.cpp 
b/clang/test/SemaCXX/ms-ctor-closure.cpp
index b508c595fe8e4..b893c9d7dde3e 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/ms-ctor-closure.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/ms-ctor-closure.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple=i386-pc-win32 -std=c++23 -fms-extensions -verify
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple=i386-pc-win32 -std=c++23 -fms-extensions -verify 
-fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter
 
 consteval int bad(int x) { return 42 / x; } // expected-note{{division by 
zero}}
 
@@ -16,10 +17,10 @@ class Test1 {
 };
 
 consteval int f1() {
-  Test1 var;
+  Test1 var{10};
   var.Test1::Test1(var); // expected-warning {{explicit constructor calls are 
a Microsoft extension}}
-  return 1;
+  return var.a;
 }
 
-static_assert(f1());
+static_assert(f1() == 10);
 }


        
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to