arsenm wrote: > If `AtomicExpand` now handles lowering atomics to non-atomic equivalents, can > we drop the `LowerAtomic` pass? Maybe a follow-up?
Maybe? Maybe it's useful as a standalone utility? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/223157 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
