linuxrocks123 wrote:

@shiltian @arsenm I don't have any personal knowledge of why ROCm implements a 
custom LTO option.  I assumed there must be a good reason for it, or we 
wouldn't have done it.

The relevant SHA adding support is 9a91602c79d9f58c16f7e65bc6e5e801e795fcdb by 
Matthew Curtis, so @macurtis-amd would probably be the best person to ask.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/224691
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to