lknknm wrote: > Yeah. I think that was exactly the reason. I think it would be less > controversial if we let Clang treat fmax etc. constexpr only since C++23 mode.
Could you elucidate? I'm afraid this change of mine could be non-conforming somehow. In any case, do you think we should update this failing test in the scope of this PR? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/225824 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
