MaskRay wrote: > I take it that supporting the existing option is too much effort? Do we have > other options that have a similar structure? > > If this is the single outlier, LGTM. If there are others, we might want to > look whether supporting this is reasonably possible.
Keeping existing `-print-pipeline-passes[=text|tree]` is feasible. Added `FlagOrEnumField` for that. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/230220 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
