ingomueller-net wrote:

> @ingomueller-net can you check if your PR is meant to fix that failure too ?

*Maybe*. The breakage you link to executes the `clang` command fine and fails 
at the next line (Line 13 of the test). *However*, it could be that it uses the 
system `clang` (because, without #230061, `clang` isn't built), which may not 
produce the files that the failing command expects. It's worth trying (and the 
fix should be applied at any rate).



https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/193426
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to