rjmccall accepted this revision. rjmccall added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Alright, I guess this all makes sense. We do have some extensions that are playing around with v-table pointers, so it's probably fair to require the v-table pointer type to be passed down instead of assuming it's just the generic pointer size. https://reviews.llvm.org/D40176 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
