erichkeane wrote:
> > > At the moment it looks between 1-2%, would there be an acceptable
> > > increase, or does the artifact size make it just completely untenable?
> >
> >
> > A 1-2% increase in startup time would be unproblematic -- what I'm actually
> > seeing in local tests is a ~20% increase in wall-time when running clang on
> > `int main() { return 0; }` (which should be about representative of
> > `./configure` use cases...) with a dylib release build.
>
> Interesting, I am not seeing the 20% increase, but I'm deep into trying to
> mess with CMake to minimize the startup time. I'd be interested in seeing if
> the patch I'm working on makes a difference if you'd be able/willing to test
> it.
I did this one: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/232409
It reduces the overhead at load time to a reasonable amount as far as I can
tell, but I'd love to see if it satisifies your concerns (regarding run-time).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/221291
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
