fhahn wrote: > > > his is a nice-to-have that does not degrade compile time, as the iterator > > > is never used. > > > > > > It looks like the compile-time tracker shows a +0.10% for stage2-O3 AFAICT? > > Yeah, not sure what it means: does it mean that clang is not optimizing away > the find from the first member of the pair on O3, while gcc is? Seems a bit > surprising, as it's just straight-forward DCE?
stage2 is built with ThinLTO, so presumably the new version cannot be optimized as well as the original version with ThinLTO. This unfortunately happens somewhat frequently :/ https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/232372 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
