redcode wrote: IMHO, it would be better if the PR that fixes the Sema bug added the assert to `PaddingChecker::shouldSkipDecl`. That way, neither PR would be blocked by a CI failure.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/232986 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
