AaronBallman wrote: > > That being said, any difference would be a bug so I'd be inclined to go > > ahead with this. > > Bug on whose side? And what are we going to do with intentional differences, > like [CWG3013](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/3013.html)?
That's discussed in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/224769 but I think the plan to set the status page to `partial` makes sense while we're hammering out those details. FWIW, with CWG3013, I believe we're planning to go with the C wording regardless. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/233285 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
