koparasy wrote: > My concern about lang option approach is that clang got a TON of other > options to control this and that, I'm not sure that having a pile of module > attributes will turn out great.
That is a valid concern, and I don't have a good answer to at the moment. I am pretty sure we can thin langopts significantly. Thinning it out though sounds pre-mature... > clang -cc1 -triple i386-apple-darwin -mlong-double-80 -emit-llvm dar.c I will try to reproduce on my local system. I did not get such a failure. Maybe I missed something. This will likely need to wait for after llvm-dev. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/234275 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
