================
@@ -562,6 +562,9 @@ void TargetInfo::adjust(DiagnosticsEngine &Diags,
LangOptions &Opts,
}
}
+ if (Opts.Int64LongLong)
+ Int64Type = SignedLongLong;
----------------
hubert-reinterpretcast wrote:
> It seems like if this is unsupported, it would be better to report the error
> to the user, rather than having an internal assertion but maybe checking this
> all the time is too expensive?
The code looks good. The behaviour of the error-path being not testable at this
time is unfortunate; but, as the change merely uses an existing diagnostic, I
guess we are okay.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/234780
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
