efriedma added a comment. > What is the best way to modify the code for this compiler change ?
Currently, the "interrupt" attribute only has an effect on functions, not function pointers, so your code won't work the way you want. It's a bug that we don't emit a warning for this. Currently, this warning doesn't have its own warning flag, instead being lumped under -Wextra. This is also a bug. We don't emit the warning if your code is compiled for a target which doesn't support floating-point (-mfpu=none or -msoft-float); see https://reviews.llvm.org/D32918. But otherwise, if you're sure your code is actually correct, you can turn off the warning with -Wno-extra or something like that. (The whole thing is kind of awkward because the implementation of the interrupt attribute in clang is buggy: the frontend lies to the backend about the calling convention, so the backend can't save/restore VFP registers correctly.) https://reviews.llvm.org/D28820 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
