lebedev.ri added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41048#950606, @CaseyCarter wrote:

> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41048#950601, @mclow.lists wrote:
>
> > These tests don't fail for me. (using a clang I built two days ago)
>
>
> What about the repro for #35578 
> <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35578>? That repro and these four 
> tests trigger the bug for me (no matching function for call to 
> '__find_idx'...could not match "const bool" against "const bool") with clang 
> version 6.0.0-svn320282-1~exp1 (trunk) freshly updated from apt.llvm.org on 
> Ubuntu trusty running atop Windows Subsystem for Linux. (We've been shipping 
> a workaround for 28385 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28385> in MSFT 
> `<variant>` forever, and in range-v3 for even longer 
> <https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/blob/master/include/meta/meta.hpp#L1979>.)
>  Both Godbolt <https://godbolt.org/g/zU11ck> and Wandbox 
> <https://wandbox.org/permlink/7T2sHvBRWGpbO0q2> agree.


What we've been trying to convey is, none of the **current** tests with 
**current** default params trigger the problem.
The difference being `-std=c++1z`. So some new tests are needed.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D41048



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to