ro added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D41240#955391, @rsmith wrote:

> Mechanically, the code change looks fine, but I can't comment on whether this 
> is a correct change for Solaris, or whether the type provided by `__float128` 
> would use the right floating-point representation. You will also need to 
> provide a test for this change.


The representation of __float128 is the same on all x86 targets AFAICT (that's 
certainly how this is done in GCC).

I've looked at the tests currently testing __float128 and except for one (to be 
enabled in a moment) already pass with this patch.


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D41240



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to