hokein added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clangd/index/Index.h:27
+  // The URI of the source file where a symbol occurs.
+  llvm::StringRef FileUri;
   // The 0-based offset to the first character of the symbol from the beginning
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> ioeric wrote:
> > sammccall wrote:
> > > nit: FileURI?
> > > (The other style is OK too, though I personally find it harder to read. 
> > > But the class is `URI` and we should be consistent)
> > I tend to use `Uri` for URI strings and `URI`/`U` for URI objects.  But I'd 
> > be okay with either, if you prefer `URI`. 
> I'm fine with either spelling, but not really with mixing the two.
> 
> Is there some precedent for using different capitalization depending on the 
> variable type? That seems... non obvious to me.
I'm +1 on `URI`, using all capital letters for initialisms can make the name a 
bit easier to read. Let's be consistent using `URI`?


Repository:
  rCTE Clang Tools Extra

https://reviews.llvm.org/D42915



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to