mstorsjo added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D43184#1005258, @rnk wrote:
> Do you think we should do something like local vftables for itanium instead?
> Can we assume all methods in the vtable will be exported by the DLL exporting
> the class?
Will this actually ever be needed for other vtables than
cxxabi::class_type_info and the others from
ItaniumRTTIBuilder::BuildVTablePointer? In what other cases are the vtables
referred to from a statically initialized global? And for these vtables -
there's no declaration of them at all within most translation units, so that'd
require hardcoding all the content of these vtables in ItaniumRTTIBuilder.
cfe-commits mailing list