mstorsjo added a comment.

In, @rnk wrote:

> Do you think we should do something like local vftables for itanium instead? 
> Can we assume all methods in the vtable will be exported by the DLL exporting 
> the class?

Will this actually ever be needed for other vtables than 
cxxabi::class_type_info and the others from 
ItaniumRTTIBuilder::BuildVTablePointer? In what other cases are the vtables 
referred to from a statically initialized global? And for these vtables - 
there's no declaration of them at all within most translation units, so that'd 
require hardcoding all the content of these vtables in ItaniumRTTIBuilder.

  rC Clang

cfe-commits mailing list

Reply via email to