oren_ben_simhon marked an inline comment as done.
oren_ben_simhon added inline comments.


================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp:1990
 
-bool Sema::CheckNoReturnAttr(const AttributeList &Attrs) {
-  if (!checkAttributeNumArgs(*this, Attrs, 0)) {
-    Attrs.setInvalid();
+static void handleNoCfCheckAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D, const AttributeList &attr) {
+  if (S.CheckAttrTarget(attr) || S.CheckAttrNoArgs(attr))
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> oren_ben_simhon wrote:
> > aaron.ballman wrote:
> > > aaron.ballman wrote:
> > > > `attr` doesn't follow the proper naming conventions.
> > > Please don't name the parameter variable after a type -- that can confuse 
> > > some editors.
> > I am following the same convention that other functions are using.
> > I am following the same convention that other functions are using.
> 
> They're doing it wrong. I can clean those up in a separate patch.
Its OK i can make the change.


================
Comment at: test/Sema/attr-nocf_check.c:18-20
+  FuncPointerWithNoCfCheck fNoCfCheck = f; // no-warning
+  (*fNoCfCheck)();                       // no-warning
+  f = fNoCfCheck;                        // no-warning
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> oren_ben_simhon wrote:
> > aaron.ballman wrote:
> > > These are an error in GCC and I think we should match that behavior. 
> > > https://godbolt.org/g/r3pf4X
> > I will create a warning however in LLVM we don't create an error upon 
> > incompatible pointer due to function attribute types.
> It should be an error -- Clang does error on this sort of thing when 
> appropriate (which I believe it is, here). For instance, calling convention 
> attributes do this: https://godbolt.org/g/mkTGLg
In Clang there is Sema::IncompatiblePointer in case to pointers are not 
compatible. This flag emits warning message. In the time i check for pointer 
incompatibility (checkPointerTypesForAssignment()), i don;t have a handle to 
the attributes. Any suggestion how to implement the exception for nocf_check 
attribute?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D41880



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to