NoQ accepted this revision.
NoQ added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I think we should land this and celebrate.
@szepet: Ouch, i was sure i already answered this, sorry, dunno where this went.
> So, LoopExit and ScopeExit would be the same but the underlying TriggerStmt
> would decide which marks a loop and which marks a variable?
I was thinking of a single `CFGElement` to mark both. Which would probably be
called "`ScopeExit`", but you could use it for detecting the end of the loop
and, if necessary, add whatever information you need into it.
================
Comment at: lib/Analysis/CFG.cpp:1700
/// way return valid LocalScope object.
LocalScope* CFGBuilder::createOrReuseLocalScope(LocalScope* Scope) {
if (Scope)
----------------
It seems that something has moved asterisks to a weird spot, might be a rebase
artifact or accidental tooling.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D16403
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
