mstorsjo added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D44582#1040578, @efriedma wrote:
> Can we just fix the bug in the backend, rather than trying to hack around it > in clang? That'd obviously be ideal - but I don't know how easy that'd be (not familiar enough with that aspect of LLVM); if it's easily doable there, why is the handling of this detail of the calling convention done in clang for normal functions to begin with? (The calling convention requires allocating stack space in the caller for the argument and return value, which isn't done in the IR emitted by clang originally when using intrinsics.) Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D44582 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
